| f(x)=f1(x)+f2(x)=0 | (9.43) |
where the equation f1(x)=-f2(x) could be solved for specified f2(x). If the inverse of f1(x), f1-1(x), is known, then the solution can be written as
| (9.44) |
where the right side of this equation defines g(x). In the case where f2(x) varies slowly with x, it may be possible to use (9.44) iteratively to find the root of (9.43).

Figure 9.3 illustrates that the root corresponds to the intersection of the two functions. As an example, consider the equation
| (9.45) |
If f2(x)=-0.01+x5+x7 and f1(x)=x2, an iterative solution can be found from
| (9.46) |
If the starting guess is 0, the iterative sequence is 0,0.1,0.09995,0.0999496, ..., so convergence is very rapid. This technique is often useful in cases where some part of the equation is complicated but introduces only a weak dependence.
The equation used by Green (1975), (1), provides a good example of the usefulness of this approach. It may be written as
| (9.47) |
where
where c=0.0765 cm-1. The problem is to find a0
given a. To obtain a form that will converge, rewrite the equation
to use the term with largest derivative with respect to a0
as f1(x):
| (9.48) |
An iteration that leads rapidly to a solution is then
| (9.49) |
For example, if a=0.3, the sequence for a0 that starts with a as the first estimate is 0.3, 0.2635, 0.26566, 0.265632, ..., which converges even faster than Newton's method for this problem.
The examples of iterative sequences shown in Fig. 9.4 illustrate the
necessity of isolating the slowest-varying component as function f1(x),
so that the function g(x) will have as small a derivative
as possible. For
,
the sequence does not converge.

| (9.50) |
where T is the temperature, Lv the latent heat of vaporization, Cp the specific heat of air at constant pressure, r the water vapor mixing ratio, and rs(Twb) the saturation mixing ratio at the wet-bulb temperature. The saturation mixing ratio is a complicated function of temperature that is exponential even in the Clausius-Clapeyron approximation, and is better expressed by the more complicated Goff-Gratch formula (cf. List, 1958, p. 350), so this equation does not have a simple analytical solution.
Newton's method provides a good solution to (9.50) under most conditions, and is particularly fast at low humidity. At high humidity, the (approximately exponential) dependence of the saturation mixing ratio on wet-bulb temperature can introduce instabilities. To increase the range over which the solution converges, it is sometime helpful to average consecutive estimates in an iterative procedure; for example, the series
| (9.51) |
converges for a wider range of temperatures than does the corresponding
series without averaging of consecutive terms.