![]() |
(8.62) |
and8.1
![]() |
(8.63) |
valid at the analyzed frequencies
where j varies from -N/2 to N/2 and so the frequency
interval is
.
For a finite sample interval from 0 to T, these estimators are related
via
| (8.64) |
| (8.65) |
Extended to discrete samples, these formulas become
![]() |
(8.66) |
![]() |
(8.67) |
where
.
For a given lag, the number of points contributing to the estimator
for the autocovariance in (8.67) increases linearly with the sample duration
T, so the variance reduces in proportion to 1/T as expected
for a mean value. However, the same is not true of the estimator for the
variance spectrum
.
As Tincreases, the range in frequencies affected by a particular
value of
decreases as 1/T, so the number of measurements contributing to
a given value of
does not increase as T increases and thus the variance in
does not decrease. Instead, the variance spectrum can be estimated at more
frequencies and those frequencies are closer spaced, but the variance in
any one of the estimates remains constant.
It can be demonstrated that the standard deviation in any single estimate of the variance spectrum is equal to the value of the variance spectrum. This 100% uncertainty makes variance spectra of little use unless averaging is used to reduce the variance. It is always important to consider uncertainty limits when evaluating the significance of features in the variance spectra. Perhaps the simplest way to reduce the variance while preserving resolution is to divide the frequency range into logarithmically spaced intervals, then average all spectral estimates that lie in the same interval. For particularly long series, the computation can be more efficient if the spectrum is calculated for segments of the complete time series and these results are then averaged to reduce the variance in the estimate of the spectrum.