Next: 2.
Measurement Uncertainty Up: 1.
Introduction Previous: 1.2
Accompanying material
1.3 Objectives
The primary objective of this text is to provide a broad background in
the methodology of experimental research. Most areas are not covered in
great depth, and it is expected that it will be necessary for readers to
delve deeper into topics like spectral analysis or the techniques of fitting
non-linear parameters before these will become comfortable tools. However,
the course should provide a good introduction to the range of approaches
available, so that an experimenter can then pursue applicable possibilities
in more depth. A material is presented at a level that will permit readers
to use the techniques and appreciate their value.
There were some other goals of the Colloquium that carry over to this
book:
-
We hoped to convey some of the flavor as well as the substance of experimental
research. The authors of Part 2 are leaders in their fields who not only
provided a state-of-the-art look at their fields, but also showed how observations
are driving progress in their areas. Experimentation in meteorology is
particularly challenging: It is hard to conduct a controlled experiment,
so often other approaches must be used to test theoretical ideas. The concept
that knowledge is tested or validated by observation is at the heart of
the scientific method. If a task of science is to explain and understand
natural phenomena, observations of those phenomena must occupy a central
role.
-
It is an unfortunate characteristic of meteorological research that experimentalists
are often guilty of inadequate attention to measurement uncertainties.
It is a goal of this text that the methodology outlined here for characterization
of measurement uncertainty might become more widely used in this field.
-
Finally, we hope to call attention to the value of careful experimental
design. Even though most atmospheric phenomena are complex, uncontrollable,
and hard to observe, it is often possible to formulate specific hypotheses,
devise critical tests of those hypotheses that distinguish among different
competing theories, then make the observations required to test those hypotheses.
This can result in faster progress than does the unsystematic collection
of data in poorly designed experiments, followed by "case-study" approaches
that hope to find something interesting. The latter approach often leads
to clues and can support many speculations, but only by chance will it
lead to definitive progress.
Next: 2.
Measurement Uncertainty Up: 1.
Introduction Previous: 1.2
Accompanying material
NCAR Advanced Study Program
http://www.asp.ucar.edu