First, consider the direct probability question: If the true
mean is
and the true standard deviation is
,
what is the probability that an observation will lie between x1
and x2? The answer is
| (3.17) |
The inverse problem follows a similar procedure. If the experimentally
determined estimate of the mean is
and
the estimate of the standard deviation is s, the procedure of the
preceding paragraphs can be used to calculate the probability that a set
of observations will give a mean
when the true mean is
.
If the value of
is
determined for which the observed mean
would be a deviation exceeded only with probability f, it is sometimes
said that there is only a probability f that the true mean exceeds
the limit
.
The weaknesses in this argument is that the true standard deviation
is also unknown, and the estimate of probability depends on knowledge of
this true standard deviation. If the experimental estimate s is
used in place of
,
this is not a true inverse procedure and can lead to erroneous indications
of confidence limits.
Abramowitz, M. and I. A. Stegun, 1972: Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover Publications, New York, 1046 pp.
Bevington, P. R., 1969: Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, 336 pp.
Box, G. E. P., W. G. Hunter, and J. S. Hunter, 1978: Statistics for Experimenters. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 653 pp.
Brownlee, K. A., 1965: Statistical Theory and Methodology in Science and Engineering. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 590 pp.
Feller, William, 1950: An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 461 pp. Statistics to Meteorology. Pennsylvania State University, 224 pp.
Press, W. H., Brian P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling, 1992: Numerical Recipies in C. Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 735 pp.