Next: 3.
Probability Distribution Functions Up: 2.
Measurement Uncertainty Previous: 2.5
Propagation of uncertainty
2.6 Monte Carlo techniques
Sometimes the functional relationships are so complex or non-linear that
the preceding analytical formulas are unwieldy. In such cases, an alternative
is to employ what is conventionally called a Monte Carlo technique.
In this approach, the measured quantities are varied randomly in ways that
represent the experimental uncertainties, and the calculations leading
to the final answer are repeated with these artificial quantities. This
is done repeatedly, and the variances and covariances in the resulting
final answers are calculated. Random number generators are available on
computer systems that generate variables having zero mean, unity variance,
and a Gaussian probability distribution. Correlated fluctuations can be
represented by defining linear combinations of such independent variables.
In cases where the error propagation is especially complex (e.g, where
the final answer might depend on non-linear fits to the input data), Monte
Carlo techniques may be the only feasible way of determining the uncertainty
in the final result.
SOURCES AND FURTHER READING:
Abernethy, R. B., and Benedict, 1984:
Abernethy, R. B., and B. Ringhiser, 1985: The history and statistical
development of the new ASME-SAE-AIAA-ISO measurement uncertainty methodology.
Barford, N.. C., 1985: Experimental Measurements: Precision, Error,
and Truth. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 159 pp.
Beers, Yardley, 1957: Introduction to the Theory of Error. Addison-Wesley.
Reading, Massachusetts, 66 pp.
Taylor, J. R., 1982: An Introduction to Error Analysis. University Science
Books, Mill Valley, California, 270 pp.
Next: 3.
Probability Distribution Functions Up: 2.
Measurement Uncertainty Previous: 2.5
Propagation of uncertainty
NCAR Advanced Study Program
http://www.asp.ucar.edu