Next: 12.2.2
Empirical linear interpolation Up: 12.2.1
Surface fitting Previous: 12.2.1.3
OTHER METHODS OF
12.2.1.4 ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
OF SURFACE FITTING
Surface fitting is an attractive method for small numbers of observations,
especially when the observing network is fixed. No background (first guess)
field is required. It is possible to account for observational error. There
are several disadvantages:
-
No incorporation of information from a background field is possible. Thus,
the meteorological knowledge about the situation is ignored, except when
variational constraints are imposed.
-
One must be wary of underfitting, overfitting, or using the wrong set of
functions. If the data are underfit (not enough functions in the polynomial
expansion), important details resolved by the data may be lost in the analysis.
If the data are overfit (too many functions), variability in the analysis
may have no meteorological significance. Gradients between observing sites
may be completely unrealistic.
-
In data sparse areas or outside the domain of observations, surface fitting
can lead to implausible functional values.
-
Surface fitting is computationally expensive when large numbers of observations
are considered. In some cases, the problem is ill-conditioned (numerically
unstable).
Next: 12.2.2
Empirical linear interpolation Up: 12.2.1
Surface fitting Previous: 12.2.1.3
OTHER METHODS
NCAR Advanced Study Program
http://www.asp.ucar.edu